← All meetings

Board of Education Meeting

Puffer School Spotlight, Facilities Review & Kindergarten Readiness

· Watch on YouTube →

The Downers Grove District 58 Board of Education held its regular meeting on February 9, 2026, featuring a spotlight on Henry Puffer School's student council and PTA accomplishments, a 10-year health and life safety facilities review, and a discussion on enhancing kindergarten readiness through a separate meet-and-greet and 'Camp Kindergarten' program.

The summary and topic labels are AI-generated and may mischaracterize what was said. The transcript is auto-captioned from YouTube. For the official record, refer to the original video.

TL;DR

Elementary Community Curriculum

Henry Puffer School presented achievements including student council initiatives focused on kindness and community service (collecting 835 pounds of food for Fish Food Pantry), PTA support for staff and families, and the school's Puffer Family system. Principal Leapart shared winter MAP and ECRA assessment data showing strong progress, with students achieving in the 82nd percentile nationally in math and 78th percentile in reading, up from fall baselines.

Facilities All Grades

Architect Nishi Sha from Whitten Company presented findings from the required Illinois State Board of Education 10-year facilities review. Nine buildings (two middle schools and seven elementary schools) were assessed. Results showed minimal violations: approximately $50,000 in urgent items (to be addressed within one year), $23,000 in required items (five years), and the majority in recommended items (10 years). The two middle schools had zero violations due to recent comprehensive referendum updates.

Elementary All Grades Budget/Finance Facilities

CSBO Dr. Harris announced the district will launch hot meal service for elementary students K-8, previously only available at middle schools. The district received a kitchen equipment grant from Representative Saba Murray and will issue an RFP for a single food service vendor to replace the current two-vendor model. Implementation begins summer 2026 with a hub-and-spoke model using middle school kitchens, with elementary schools using warmers and finishing stations. Board recommendations expected by May or June 2026.

Kindergarten Curriculum Community

The district presented two proposed enhancements to kindergarten readiness for fall 2026 implementation: (1) a separate kindergarten-focused meet-and-greet event held earlier than the all-school event to reduce overwhelming experiences, and (2) a 'Camp Kindergarten' or 'Team Kindergarten' model where students spend the first 2 days rotating through team groupings with all kindergarten staff before classroom assignments are made on day 3. This allows teachers to observe students and make more informed balanced class placements. The model was previously piloted successfully at two schools in 2019 with minimal parental concerns. Discussion items included timing of class notifications, inclusion of special programs students, and communication strategies.

Curriculum All Grades Technology

Dr. Russell reported on district curriculum and instruction activities including a successful band and orchestra solo fest with 495 student performances, the upcoming District 58 Festival of Music on February 19th, and a curriculum workshop scheduled for February 23rd to discuss winter data snapshots and middle school MAP pilot initiatives.

Staffing All Grades

Dr. Russell announced that at the March board meeting, the district will provide a high-level preview of staffing planning for the next school year. Additionally, the 2027-28 school calendar will be discussed with the goal of approval in April, achieving better alignment with District 99's calendar since construction will no longer impact start and end dates.

Special Education All Grades

The district announced it will offer extended school year (ESY) programming from June 12 through July 14 for eligible students with disabilities. Eligible students will receive direct invitations from their case managers with program details.

Technology All Grades

District 58 transitioned to digital delivery of benchmark assessment reports via Parent Square's secure document delivery system rather than printing. Parents must sign into their Parent Square accounts to access reports, which improves security, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness.

Community Policy

The district rescheduled its annual legislative breakfast (postponed due to extreme cold) to Friday, February 20th at 7 a.m. at Eric Middle School. The event brings together state legislators for discussion on key issues impacting District 58 and the broader school community.

Budget/Finance All Grades

The financial advisory committee discussed updates to the district's fund balance and capital policies as the district emerges from the referendum period. A new capital policy targets approximately $750,000 annually (roughly the cost of half a roof per year) for long-term maintenance needs. The fund balance policy is being reframed on a cash basis rather than accrual accounting, with language to be finalized before the end of the school year.

Special Education Facilities Budget/Finance

Dr. Russell reported that the SASID cooperative is exploring cost-neutral options for relocating its administrative offices and transition program from the current Octon Avenue and Lyall location. The finance committee is examining building purchase options that would allow SASID to issue debt certificates without requiring member districts to incur additional debt.

**Hughes:** All right. Good evening, everyone. This is the regular meeting of the Downers Grove School District 58 Board of Education, here on Monday, February the 9th, 2026, at 7 p.m. here at the Downers Grove Civic Center. This meeting is being live-streamed for the public on the Village of Downers Grove's YouTube channel. Melissa, will you please call roll? **Secretary Jerves:** Member Bernard. **Bernard:** Here. **Secretary Jerves:** Member Doshi. **Doshi:** Here. **Secretary Jerves:** Member Ellis is absent. Member Hanus. **Hanus:** Here. **Secretary Jerves:** Member Olczyk. **Olczyk:** Here. **Secretary Jerves:** Member Thomas. **Thomas:** Here. **Secretary Jerves:** Member Hughes. **Hughes:** Here. Just as a quick note for everyone, later on in the agenda, we had a spotlight on our education foundation that has actually been postponed until April because the presenter is out sick today. So if anybody was here for that, just wanted to give you a heads up. Another quick announcement: tonight, members of the audience will have an opportunity to provide public comment later on in the agenda. The board asks anyone wishing to comment to please fill out a card — they're over there by the main door. Fill out that card, indicate the topic to be addressed, and then place it in that basket. I have allotted 30 minutes tonight for public comment. All right, we're going to go ahead and start as we always do with the Pledge of Allegiance. I'd like to welcome up the student council members from Henry Puffer School to lead us. **Student:** I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. **Hughes:** Thank you so much. Now I'd like to welcome up the principal of Henry Puffer School, Principal Leapart. **Principal Leapart:** Good evening, everyone. It's an honor for Henry Puffer to shine a spotlight on all the wonderful things going on in our school today. We are going to have some of our student council reps talk to you, as well as our PTA presidents, and then I'll share a few of our spotlights and some of the data that we've been working through this year. First up is Brooke Vogt. **Student (Medina Abbas):** Good evening. My name is Medina Abbas. I'm one of the fifth grade student council representatives. This year, the student council board has several goals to make sure that we all have a fun and successful year. Our main goal was to take as many opinions from the student body as possible and not just come up with these ideas ourselves. One of the most important goals was to spread kindness throughout the school. We did this through a kindness-themed spirit week and a kindness club. Everyone is working hard to spread kindness throughout the school and all the grades. Our most powerful goal was to have a fundraiser for many different organizations. One of the organizations that we helped was the FISH Food Pantry in Downers Grove. We did this to help families in Downers Grove and nearby areas with food and supplies. Last but not least, our final goal was to have better communication with PTA members. We were able to build a relationship with PTA members by asking our student council teacher sponsors to communicate to the PTA for student council, as we donated to their event which helped many Puffer families. Next, you will hear from my fellow council member Brooke Vogt, who will discuss our exciting spirit week themes at Henry Puffer. **Student (Brooke Vogt):** Hi. This year, student council has done many fun spirit days at our school. Some examples of these spirit days are Red Ribbon Week, Holiday Spirit Week, and PJ Day. These spirit days help students show school spirit and have fun together. Some spirit days are also fundraisers that help support school activities. We ask students to participate and enjoy dressing up with their classmates. Spirit days are a win-win because students have fun and help the school at the same time. With student council this year, we hope to make school more exciting and create even more fun spirit days. **Student (Carson Sandage):** Hi. My name is Carson Sandage. I'm on Henry Puffer Student Council. We have done a number of fundraisers so far this year. In December, we held a food drive for FISH Food Pantry. If you donated food, you could get raffle tickets to try to win a giant bear. In total, we collected and donated 835 pounds of food to help people in our community. We also set up a school shop to raise money and build school spirit. The Henry Puffer Student Council is excited to support our school community and the Downers Grove community. **Student (Elena Collive):** Hi, my name is Elena Collive, and I am one of the fifth grade student council representatives. Henry Puffer loves to help. We help by spreading kindness, handing out blue tickets, hosting school spirit days, and running our school store. Henry Puffer uses a system of blue tickets. Every time a kid makes a good choice — like finishing their homework or helping a peer — a teacher might spot them and give them a blue ticket. Then at school assemblies, our principal, Mr. Leapart, picks one from all the collected tickets, and whoever that ticket belongs to gets a prize. This is our way of encouraging good choices. We have also set up our school store. Every other Wednesday, our representatives go to each grade level and kids can buy pencils, erasers, or pens. Fun school supplies make learning even more fun. And these are just some of the ways our student council helps Henry Puffer. Next up are our PTA presidents, Jackie Olitz and Carrie McTagart. **PTA President (Jackie Olitz):** Hi, thank you for having us. That is a really tough act to follow — very impressive work by our student council. My name is Jackie Olitz. **PTA President (Carrie McTagart):** I'm Carrie McTagart. We are in our second year as PTA co-presidents at Henry Puffer with the Puffer Hefty PTA. I want to highlight the rest of our board for a couple of reasons. One, we have a treasurer, Dan Hint, who's now in his unprecedented second term. I don't know if anybody knows, but it's not often you see somebody raise their hand to go another two years, so a shoutout to Dan. We're also really impressed with our PTA in the sense that our dads are very active in our PTA and with all of our events, so we want to make sure we gave a spotlight to that. Emily Middle serves as our vice president and is in her first year, and Sheila Brigette serves as our secretary and is also in her second year. So with that, we're going to talk a little bit about the ways that we connect and support our Puffer community. First, this year we did our second Halloween Bingo, but this year our chairs took it to another level and made it a zero-waste event — there was absolutely no waste generated by this event held on site at the school, which was really extraordinary. It was a great opportunity to show the kids that we can continue to do fun things without generating a lot of waste. We also do a long run to honor Gene Pogue, but this year we added color to the run, which was really exciting for the kids. They had a choice at the end of the run whether they wanted to run through the color stations, in case that was overstimulating for them — an exciting new addition. And then this year, Carrie orchestrated a poinsettia fundraiser, which was new and fun. It was a really nice way at our waffle breakfast for families to pick up their poinsettias and have those as gifts for their families as well. We continue to do a monthly newsletter. This was new. One of the things that PTAs really struggle with is the fact that all different generations want to communicate differently — there's email, there's ParentSquare, there's Facebook pages. We are in our second year of offering a monthly newsletter for our families, in addition to Mr. Leapart's Puffer Post, so that we can continue to communicate all the things that are happening for our staff, students, and teachers. And then kinder and new family outreach — this is one of the things that Carrie and I are really proud of. Every year we call every single new kindergarten family to try and touch base with them and welcome them into Puffer. We also do that for all new families regardless of grade coming into our school. We want them to know who we are, know who the PTA is, and feel like they have someone they can reach out to if they have questions, versus feeling like contacting the school is scary. Things like: what does the ice cream social look like, and what is the dungeon — if anybody doesn't know what that is at Puffer. **Carrie McTagart:** Supporting our school and staff — these are just a list of things that the PTA brings to bear within Henry Puffer. A couple of things I do want to highlight that are sort of in addition to what you would probably hear from most parent-teacher organizations. We do a staff holiday gift drive. We want to make sure that not just our teachers — who feel the love from their students every holiday season — but also any staff member and/or teacher that doesn't have their own classroom has a holiday gift from the PTA as well. Enrichment requests: we take our largest fundraiser of the year and figure out how much overflow we have after covering all of our events and items, and then we give it back to the teachers as an opportunity to ask for enrichments for their classroom or things that serve the school as a whole — things like wobble stools in different classrooms, if that's something a teacher has extra need for. The PTA does what we can to make sure we can provide that at the end of each school year. The other thing that is new this year — usually students can order school supply boxes, and the PTA usually provides a box for each of the teachers as well for extra supplies. What we've realized is there are like 25 pink erasers that the teachers don't need anymore. So we are doing something new this year: in January, we collected requests for what items teachers are actually missing. **Jackie Olitz:** Mostly Kleenex. **Carrie McTagart:** Mostly Kleenex and Expo markers. And then the money that we would have spent on the pre-packed boxes, we're using that to actually buy the supplies that teachers need to help in the classroom for the second half of the year. First year we're doing this — I think it's going to be perfect. We're really excited. Again, another long list of things that we do just to support our students across the school. One of the things I'll say about our PTA and our parent and caregiver community as a whole: we do everything in our power to be able to say yes to every request that comes from our school. We know that we have varying degrees of resources, exposure, and access across our community, and so the PTA takes it very much to heart to make the experience as equitable as possible for all of the students that come into Puffer. The class t-shirts are fun — Carrie made a huge effort to bring those back. The PTA supports each class having their own color and every student having a t-shirt. These are great for our teachers on field trips because they can spot their students, and they've also been a really fun way for each class to represent themselves during school assemblies. It's kind of a rainbow of colors across the gym, which is really fun. This is again just a list of things showcasing a lot of the fun that we have and more ways that we're supporting our families and community. I talked a little bit about Halloween Bingo and it being zero-waste. The other thing I would highlight: we do a holiday breakfast every year — it's usually a pancakes-and-pajamas type of deal. This year, our extraordinary parents took on making waffles, which we thought was crazy, but they did it without a hitch and it was awesome and people loved it. Both of those events are self-funded, and we are able to take all of the overage from ticket sales and donations and give that money back to community members. For folks that need a little additional support, we purchase gift cards with that overage and those are given out over the holiday season to families in our community. **Jackie Olitz:** Anything else? **Carrie McTagart:** That's the biggest one. **Jackie Olitz:** Okay, that's it. So just to talk a little bit about our Panther Pride — if you weren't getting that from us yet, then we haven't done our job. **Carrie McTagart:** Oh, this is you. **Jackie Olitz:** Oh — I edited this, so I apologize. **Carrie McTagart:** I think I know where to start. I'll steal your thunder. Thank you for having us. We appreciate it. **Jackie Olitz:** Just for context, the dungeon is not where we send misbehaving students — it's storage in the basement. **Principal Leapart:** At Henry Puffer, our work truly starts and ends with people — our students, teachers, families, and community. Our Henry Puffer families come together once a month, providing students with meaningful opportunities to build relationships with Puffer Panthers across all grade levels. Students remain in the same Puffer family with the same staff member from the time they join us in kindergarten until the time they leave us in fifth or sixth grade, fostering strong connections and a deep sense of belonging. Our school environment is rooted in being respectful, responsible, and safe, and we intentionally cultivate a positive school culture grounded in the tenets of the Happiness Advantage. Our strong partnership with families is reflected in our collaboration with our amazing PTA and in initiatives such as Watchdogs and Puffer Reunions. We're excited to welcome our Watchdogs fathers and father figures each Wednesday as they spend half the day supporting classrooms and making lasting memories with their children. We also host reunions for former Puffer students who return to visit their old stomping grounds — we even had someone come from as far as Hawaii this year. This year we were thrilled to partner with Lyman Woods to create the Henry Puffer Garden on the southwest corner of our building, connecting with our already-established Hannah's Garden. This special project included Mr. Maywin, one of our Puffer parents and a Lyman Woods member, who taught students about native plants and worked alongside students and parent volunteers to bring the garden to life. We're hoping this will be an outdoor space our school and community will enjoy for years to come. Students also thrive through a wide variety of clubs and activities, including running club, podcasting club, photography, kindness club, student council, and our fifth and sixth grade buddies. Together, these opportunities create a vibrant, inclusive environment where students feel connected, supported, and empowered to grow. Our guiding beliefs center on the idea that all students can learn and thrive when our work is intentional, focused, and aligned. We use a funnel approach in which district goals inform our building priorities, those priorities guide our classroom practice, and instruction ultimately impacts each individual student. This alignment ensures coherence and clarity across all levels of work. We believe that what we look for is what we find, which reinforces the importance of directing our energy toward strengths, effective practices, and factors within our control. When we intentionally seek out positives, we're better positioned to build upon them, just as overemphasis on negatives can limit growth. Data plays a critical role in informing instruction and guiding decision-making, allowing us to adjust practices in ways that enhance student learning through cycles of inquiry. We focus our collective efforts on instructional strategies that yield the greatest impact, supporting continuous improvement in literacy, math, and school culture and climate. Our first goal addresses an identified area of need based on the ECRA and NWEA MAP data and supports overall literacy development while aligning with the Illinois Comprehensive Literacy Plan. Teachers use student work, assessment data, and teacher estimates of instruction from John Hattie to plan targeted instruction aligned to Benchmark Advance, with an emphasis on intentional small-group instruction. Resources such as Scholastic News and Scope are incorporated across grade levels to provide regular practice with informational texts. Progress is monitored through assessment reviews, PLC+ data discussions, and instructional planning, with effectiveness measured using our ECRA propensity model, MAP results, and ongoing feedback from our instructional coaches. Our second goal focuses on developing deep mathematical thinking, reasoning, and transferable skills through the intentional use of backwards design and deliberate practice. Teachers have integrated problem-solving opportunities into daily instruction, utilizing Forefront MAP and ECRA data to monitor progress and adjust lessons, and collaborate with grade-level teams to ensure alignment with all standards. Our instructional coaches have supported planning, data analysis, and modeling of effective strategies. Progress is monitored through student growth in the ECRA and MAP assessments as well as benchmark testing, Forefront reporting, and team data discussions, with ongoing accountability provided through unit meetings, team planning, and coaching feedback. Our third goal has focused on strengthening trust and instructional leadership to support a positive school culture. Efforts have included structured ILT collaboration to build collective teacher efficacy, staff and committee meetings that provide opportunities for feedback and shared decision-making, and professional learning sessions that incorporate teacher input into instructional planning. Classroom rotations during our staff meetings have highlighted teacher-led strategies, successes, and innovations. Progress has been monitored through ongoing check-in surveys, ensuring continuous growth in school culture and climate. Our winter MAP results show some pretty strong progress for our students. In math, students achieved in the 82nd percentile nationally in the winter — that's an increase up from the 65th percentile in the fall. In reading, our students scored in the 78th percentile nationally, up from the 64th percentile in the fall. Student growth was also quite impressive, with math growth in the 84th percentile nationally and reading growth in the 74th percentile. Our winter ECRA data provides another snapshot of our student performance and shows meaningful improvement from where we began in the fall. ECRA offers a different perspective than MAP, as its calculations are based on where students finished in the previous spring and do not include students in grades 1 through 6 who were new to us this year. Overall, 74% of our students met benchmark, representing a 6% increase from fall, and 86% demonstrated high or expected growth, an increase of 9%. The overall growth effect size improved to -0.01, which was a 0.13 gain from the fall — pretty significant. In math, 70% of our students met their benchmark, which was up 7%, with 85% of our students showing high or expected growth — an increase of 13% — and the growth effect size improving to -0.05, which is a gain of 0.37. In reading, 79% of our students met benchmark, which was an increase of 6%, and 89% demonstrated high or expected growth, which is up 4%, with a growth effect size of +0.03, which is slightly lower than it was in the fall. As far as grade levels are concerned, our winter growth data for Henry Puffer shows generally strong performance across grade-level cohorts with clear areas for some targeted support in math. Kindergarten, second, third, and fourth grade cohorts demonstrated positive growth effect sizes, with our third grade cohort showing particularly strong growth. The kindergarten and first grade cohorts had high percentages of students meeting benchmark, though first grade growth was notably lower — likely influenced by this cohort having finished last year in the 99th percentile. In the upper grade-level cohorts, fifth and sixth grades had fewer students meeting benchmark, but most demonstrated expected growth, highlighting steady progress alongside opportunities for closing achievement gaps. In reading, the kindergarten, second, third, and fifth grade cohorts posted positive growth effect sizes. The first and fourth grade cohorts had solid benchmark attainment but slightly negative growth, indicating progress closer to expected levels rather than accelerated. The sixth grade cohort demonstrated expected growth for most students, though the growth effect size was slightly negative, suggesting a need for some targeted support to strengthen progress. Overall, the data shows strong foundational performance across the school with opportunities to improve and accelerate learning, particularly in first, fourth, fifth, and sixth grade cohorts. One area that we continue to closely monitor is the growth of our subgroups. Winter growth data for Henry Puffer shows that all student subgroups achieved growth within the expected range, with some groups demonstrating particularly strong progress. In math, our English learners, Asian students, and other student groups showed positive growth effect sizes, while Black, Hispanic, IEP, and low-income students had slightly lower growth but still within the expected range. Gender differences were minimal, with male students showing slightly higher growth than females. In reading, our ELs, Asian, and other student groups posted positive growth, while Black, Hispanic, IEP, and low-income students had slightly negative growth effect sizes — again, all within the expected range. Overall, subgroup data highlights steady progress across our school while identifying opportunities to accelerate learning for specific groups to further close those achievement gaps. One of the metrics our team tracks is the percentage of students performing in the average quintile and above on MAP over time. This provides a snapshot of student achievement growth over the past three and a half years. We typically see the largest gains from fall to winter with slight regression from winter to spring, and more pronounced regression from spring to fall, reflecting both summer slide and the impact of our more transient student population. Despite this, the overall trend line in both math and reading remains positive. Currently, 92.5% of our students are performing in the average quintile and above in math, and about 88% are in the average quintile and above in reading — an increase of 7% in math and 4.5% in reading from last winter. I won't continue on with any more numbers, but I do thank you for the time and the opportunity to shine a spotlight on Henry Puffer School. **Hughes:** Thank you so much. For all our student council members, we do have some gifts for you. Thank you for being here tonight. All right. Listed on tonight's agenda are 20 communications received by the board. Are there any additional communications a board member would like to share at this time? That brings us to our next item. We're going to start off tonight with our 10-year health life safety review with Kevin Bart. **Presenter (Nishi Sha, Whiten Company):** Hello. I'm Nishi Sha with Whiten Company. I'm an architect and project manager. I've been working on all of your referendum projects for the schools. Every 10 years, the Illinois State Board of Education requires the district to have a licensed architectural professional walk all of your buildings to make sure they're in compliance with applicable building codes. Each building is on a 10-year cycle. The majority of your buildings — **[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah, Whiten Company]** Hello. I'm Nishi Shah with Whiten Company. I'm an architect and project manager. I've been working on all of your referendum projects for the schools. Every 10 years, the Illinois State Board of Education requires the district to have a licensed architectural professional walk all your buildings to make sure they're in compliance with applicable building codes. Each building is on a 10-year cycle. The majority of your buildings are on 10-year cycles from 2015 to 2025, with the exception of Henry Puffer, as you acquired that separately. That one is on a 2023 cycle, so Henry Puffer was done two years ago and we completed that at that time. We currently have the remaining schools that we need to complete for the 10-year life safety review. Because we have all the construction projects from the referendum, we have scheduled these to happen after all those projects are done, so you're having minimal violation items. At this round we are looking at nine buildings: your two middle schools, which were completed this December, and seven elementary schools from the phase one and phase two work — Hillcrest, Highland, Whittier, Fairmount, Kingsley, Lester, and — **[BOARD MEMBER]** Indian Trail. **[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]** Indian Trail. Thank you. I was like — **[BOARD MEMBER]** That was still pretty impressive. **[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]** The remaining schools — the three elementary schools — we will be looking at in the fall of this year after their summer projects are completed. So Baer, Elsie, and Pierce Town will be looked at after those are completed. We're required to complete four documents. The first is existing building conditions. We have to write narratives about what your building systems are now and what codes apply. We have to provide updated floor plans showing life safety data — meaning the rating of the walls, the mechanical system, and where your smoke detectors are. The main part of it is that we have to document violations. We walk your buildings, check them against the code in effect when they were built, and verify that everything is in compliance. We walked the buildings for these first nine after construction was done — either in the fall of this year or this past January — and we had the preliminary findings, which we walked through with Kevin Bartau and Greg Harris a week or so ago. In terms of process and methodology: we have done a lot of your projects already, so we have a really good picture of your buildings. They are in really good shape with a minimal number of violations. There are three different categories for violations. The first is **urgent** — an immediate hazard to life or safety of the students. These must be addressed within one year. ISBE tells you that you need to address these items within a year. This can be something structural, something related to exiting, or fire detection — making sure all your smoke detectors are working — so that in the event of some type of incident, students can exit safely. The second is **required** — these must be addressed within five years. Examples include electrical outlets near water that need GFCI protection. The third is **recommended**, which is within 10 years. These are not required, but you can add them. They are typically accessibility items — sidewalks, playgrounds — things that may have a tripping hazard or similar condition. Generally, your buildings are in really good shape. The middle schools, because they had comprehensive updates during the referendum projects, have no violations — we really touched every part of those buildings and everything is in compliance. Your remaining elementary schools had some minimal items. We have about $50,000 in urgent items. These might be a penetration in a wall that needs to be sealed or a door that needs to swing a different direction. Most of these were in areas that we did not touch during the referendum projects. In addition to that, you have about $23,000 in five-year required items. This might be outlets in classrooms that are near sinks — you have a lot of sinks in your elementary school classrooms, and there are probably outlets that have been there for 50 years that need to be updated with proper safety protection. The recommended category contains the majority of items. These are not required, but include things like Whittier paving — we know there are a lot of bumps in that asphalt — or areas where you might have certain glass that, if broken, would need to be replaced. Those are all 10-year recommended items. So to summarize: these seven elementary schools have the items I described. The two middle schools had no violations. We will be completing the remainder in the fall. I'll see you here about a year from now. --- **[BOARD MEMBER]** Questions or comments? We were going to ask the same question. **[BOARD MEMBER]** I'm assuming yes, but I wanted to ask — did we review those urgent and required items and identify any that were in the scope of enhancements over the past two to three years of projects where we would have expected our contractors to be accountable? **[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]** When we walked those buildings, we did ask whether each item was something that was part of the referendum and should have been taken care of versus whether it was a separate item. So we did discern those items. **[BOARD MEMBER]** So everything on this list is not within that bucket, and those items were handled by the contractors? **[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]** Correct. **[BOARD MEMBER]** I was going to ask if we can get the list. **[BOARD MEMBER]** Yes, I believe that was on the agenda. **[BOARD MEMBER]** I think it was on the agenda earlier, but now all we see is the presentation. The individual reports were there this morning. **[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]** They were — let me check. Right now they are drafts. We'll have to upload them to ISBE once you approve, and it is a draft version currently. **[BOARD MEMBER]** Is it — click the link? **[BOARD MEMBER]** Is it the survey? **[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]** This should be the violations. **[BOARD MEMBER]** It's done by individual school, then. **[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]** Yes, it is. **[BOARD MEMBER]** If you click the link that says "survey." **[BOARD MEMBER]** Okay, sorry — I didn't know what the main files were. Yeah, it looks like the top has it. **[BOARD MEMBER]** Nice. And then it takes you to the drive, and they're all in there. **[BOARD MEMBER]** I see. Thank you. **[Dr. Russell / Staff]** And if any board member wants more specifics on anything you see in the list, Kevin Bartau and Nishi can get that to you in an update. **[BOARD MEMBER]** Any other comments or questions? We appreciate your time. Thank you very much. **[BOARD MEMBER]** Thank you, Nishi. --- **[BOARD MEMBER]** All right. As I said earlier, we're going to be skipping the Education Foundation presentation tonight — that has been moved to April. That brings us to the reports of the board. We'll start with the superintendent report. Dr. Russell. --- **[Dr. Russell — Superintendent Report]** Thank you. For my report tonight, I'll start with personnel. Tonight's personnel report is more of a preview. At our March meeting, there will be two topics discussed. First, Justin will share a high-level preview of staffing planning for next school year and an update on where we are in that process. Additionally, we will discuss the 2027–28 calendar, with the hope of approving that calendar at the April meeting. We're looking forward to more complete alignment with District 99's calendar because construction will no longer impact our start and end dates. As a reminder, the 2026–27 calendar has already been approved and is up on our website for anyone to view. In terms of curriculum and instruction, this past weekend the band and orchestra solo fest was held and it was a huge success. More than 495 solos and ensembles were performed at this event — I had to do a double take when I read that number. We have a very robust performing arts program here in our district and they did a great job. We want to thank our instrumental music department for all their hard work planning and preparing, and thank our parent volunteers who helped keep the day running. As you can imagine, when you have almost 500 students performing, it requires a lot of volunteers and we are really grateful for everyone. It was a wonderful event. Speaking of wonderful events, we're looking forward to the District 58 Festival of Music, which will take place next week on February 19th at Downers Grove South. We alternate between the two high school venues. This is always a fun event when O'Brien and Herrick combine their bands, orchestras, and choirs, so you don't want to miss that one if you're available that evening. On February 23rd, we will also hold our curriculum workshop here. At the workshop, we'll share the winter data snapshot as well as updates on the middle school MAP pilot and the work of many of our district committees. We'll also have a discussion about athletics and activities for next school year at the middle schools. Finance will be covered by Dr. Harris in his CSBO report, so we'll skip that here. For technology: this past Friday, District 58 sent benchmark assessment reports home via ParentSquare using its secure document delivery system. Sending reports home digitally is more secure, efficient, and cost-effective than printing reports for all students. For security reasons, these reports are not sent as attachments — instead, parents are required to sign into their ParentSquare account to view them. The nice thing about that is that once you do, they are always there and accessible. We appreciate that feature in ParentSquare, and it is one of the new advantages of our new system. For special services: District 58 looks forward to offering extended school year programming to eligible students with disabilities. Students who qualify for ESY through their IEP will receive a direct invitation and more information from their child's case manager. Dates for the program will be June 12th through July 14th. That sounds like a long way away, but it will come very quickly — as today's hundredth day of school, which our kindergarten teachers demonstrated, reminds us. It is a little later this year because of our late start, but we are getting closer and closer to the end of the school year. For public relations: just a reminder about our legislative breakfast, which was postponed due to the extreme cold day. District 58 will host its annual legislative breakfast — really more of a forum than a formal breakfast — on Friday, February 20th at 7 a.m. at Herrick Middle School. Several state legislators are expected to attend. The event provides an opportunity to engage in discussion around key issues impacting District 58 and the broader school community. I want to thank our legislative committee for their hard work organizing this forum every year. It's always a good event and it's nice to speak with our legislators. We have also sent out both of our annual surveys — the District 58 climate survey and the Five Essentials survey. We encourage families to take both. The Five Essentials survey is also available to all staff, and students in grades four through eight will take it as well. So those are coming up. That concludes my report. --- **[BOARD MEMBER]** Fantastic. Any questions or comments on the superintendent report? All right. That brings us to our monthly business and treasurer's report. Dr. Harris. --- **[Dr. Harris — CSBO Report]** Good evening, members of the board. Tonight I will be speaking on just two topics. The first is the year-to-date report and the treasurer's report, which is included in your packet. I'd like to offer a little analysis on the year-to-date report. On the revenue side, some things drawing my attention: I think we're running a bit low on our state special education funding. We think we're going to be off there a little bit — that has to do with proration hitting us a bit more deeply than we anticipated. But there are bright spots as well. One is interest revenue, and some of the big ones we count on — EAV, property taxes — are all running really well. Our local revenue in the other column is also a bright spot. So there are some places where we're off to the negative and some where we're off to the good, and it kind of balances out. On the expenditure side, I'm looking very closely at salaries and benefits since those are our biggest costs. I think we're a little bit under on salaries and a little bit over on benefits, especially in the educational fund. But since the salaries number is much larger than the benefits number, I'd much rather be favorably off on salaries than unfavorably off. I'm pleased with that and I don't think there's anything to be concerned about. I'll pause and see if any board members have any questions on the monthly reports. **[No questions.]** The other item is just an FYI for the board of education and the community. Very soon the district will be putting out our request for proposals for our food service program. We are acknowledging that the board has a new vision for what that program should look like — specifically, hot meals for all students, K through 8. Previously that had only been available at the middle schools. We currently have two vendors handling our middle school program and our elementary program separately. We are going to be looking for one vendor to handle everything. Since the scope of the project has changed, we are going out for an RFP. You will also see in tonight's construction consent agenda the realization of this vision from the board of education, as we are purchasing a lot of equipment for our kitchens thanks to a grant provided by Representative Anstafa. This is just an FYI — there's no news yet, just that we are in the process of moving forward. We expect to bring a recommendation to the board at the May or June meeting at the latest. Any questions? **[No questions.]** --- **[Dr. Russell]** We are very excited to receive this kitchen grant from Representative Saba. Like our playgrounds, this is a huge help. We had always planned to use the interest money from the referendum for kitchen equipment — that was something we discussed after the referendum — but this grant really does help us and almost erases the entire cost of putting the kitchen equipment in. As a reminder for the board, last summer we were able to complete the kitchen work for the phase two schools. This summer we'll be doing the kitchen work at the phase one and phase three elementary schools. Some schools are a bit easier to work with — Henry Puffer is a good example because they used to have a food service program when it was its own district. Other schools are more challenging. When you think about a school like Highland or Lester, the kitchen area is that small room off the gym, and there are building code requirements that we have to squeeze in there. I want to thank our architects for getting very creative with that. This is something we have been hearing about for a long time. I know the board has heard about it, and I've certainly heard about it since I've been superintendent here. We are one of the only remaining districts in the area that does not offer a food service program for our elementary students. With so many of our families having two working parents, this is a really good thing for our families. It's also a really nice thing for any student who qualifies for free and reduced lunch, so that they're able to get a consistent meal day in and day out at our schools. We're very happy to move this forward. Next year will certainly be a learning year — when you haven't done something in over 100 years and then implement it, I'm sure there will be some bumps in the road. But with the new middle school kitchens, we're very excited about the plan and the rollout. --- **[BOARD MEMBER]** Fantastic. Questions or comments? Appreciate it. Thank you. All right, onto our committees. The policy committee has not met since the last board meeting. Neither has the legislative committee. The financial advisory committee has met. You heard a little about that in the report — we went over the year-to-date report, things in general were looking good, and we talked about the food service RFP. The only thing I'd add is that, as Dr. Russell was alluding to, we have very small kitchens in our grade schools. So it will be a hub-and-spoke model. The dividing line will be the train tracks — each middle school will be the starting point for food preparation, and the elementary schools will have more of a warmer-and-finisher setup. A big part of that bid is also going to keep the grade schools, at least in the opening bid, on a pre-order model. Students pre-order for the week from a menu. That helps us keep down food waste and makes sure kids actually get the meal they were looking for rather than something running out in the process. The RFP is included in tonight's packet. This is the first phase, which will go out to bid, and we're looking forward to getting one vendor to handle this whole piece. If you remember, Quest at the time could not deliver to the grade schools at a price that made sense. They were willing to hold back, and they even shared their ordering system to help us bridge this gap. Now we can't make a major change without going back out to RFP, so this is required for us even apart from the timing. We had done a one-year contract and then extended it with Quest. The other big topic we discussed was policies. There are really two significant policies that previously came out of the financial advisory committee: our fund balance policy and our capital policy. Now that we're coming out of a referendum, we're looking at making some adjustments and tying those policies to our long-term needs — specifically looking out five years and making sure we're funding things appropriately. We're looking at starting off at about $750,000 in capital reserves. We've been reviewing the language around that, making sure we're within the boundaries of what is required by law and what we're actually going to need. As you may know, our DSAB bonding ability is going to need to be used for other purposes, so we need to make sure we have the ability to maintain things. A good frame of reference — and one of the reasons why $750,000 stands out — is that it's about half a roof per year in savings. Roofs are one of our more expensive recurring needs. The other policy is our fund balance policy. We're looking at reframing that as we've dialed everything into a purely cash basis rather than toggling back and forth between accrual and cash. Part of it is: what can we cover now, and what do we need to cover? Right now we still have our arbitrage dollars, so we're in a position where we need to set ourselves up to reach that minimum number in a year or two. What should that exactly look like, and how should we define it? We're looking at a blend — the overall percentage to expenses as well as the number of days cash on hand — because of the way we get funded at the beginning and end of our fiscal year. If we can show on a graph where our low cash points fall, it's easy to see whether we're capable of covering our expenses throughout the year. We're going to be getting some language together over the next couple of meetings and will bring it forward before the end of the school year. We think the new language will not only cover what we need to do but set us up to be successful. Steve, did I miss anything? **[Dr. Harris]** No, you got it covered. **[BOARD MEMBER]** Questions or comments from the board? Okay. The district leadership team has not met, and neither has health and wellness. We do have a SASID report. Dr. Russell. --- **[Dr. Russell — SASID Report]** The biggest thing we're working on with SASID right now centers on SASID's facilities. Short-term, we're figuring out all the leases for classroom spaces. As you know, District 58 will house more SASID classrooms, and we're going over all of those with the executive director — not only here in District 58 but for all member districts in SASID. Long-term, SASID's facility and finance committees are working on some options for the co-op, particularly regarding their district office and transition program. The current space on Ogden Avenue in Lisle is not really conducive to either the transition program or the office in general. They are looking at different options for purchasing a building that can house their administrative center as well as the transition program. One of the things I love to hear as a superintendent — and I'm sure the board will too — is that we are only looking at cost-neutral options, meaning that member districts will not have to incur any debt as a result of what SASID is trying to do in terms of the long-term facility plan. We're looking at spreading the debt out over several years, as we do in local school districts, so that SASID can be the one to issue any debt certificates and local districts would not have to absorb that. More to come on that, but we are getting closer. I do serve on the finance committee for SASID, so I'm paying particularly close attention to how this might impact member districts while still ensuring that we have a great facility for not only our transition program but for the administrative offices as well. --- **[BOARD MEMBER]** Questions or comments? I just want to say that the overall cost has been a concern of ours — obviously we're dealing with some financial challenges in general — so I'm glad to hear that — **Dr. Russell (or Mr. Sisle):** Another thing to note here is that we are only looking at cost-neutral options, meaning that member districts will not have to incur any debt as a result of what SASID is trying to do in terms of the long-term facility plan. We're looking at spreading the debt out over several years, like we do in local school districts, to make sure that SASID can be the one who issues any debt certificates and the local districts would not have to absorb that. So, more to come on that, but we are getting closer. I do serve on the finance committee for SASID, so I'm paying particularly close attention to how that might impact member districts while still ensuring that we have a great facility for not only our transition program, but for the administrative offices as well. **Board Member:** Questions or comments? I just want to say that I think that has been a concern of ours — the overall cost. Obviously, we're dealing with some financial challenges here in general, so I'm glad to hear that that's been a priority in your conversations. **Board Member:** Yes, certainly the financial challenges of District 58 with proration and categorical payments are not unique to our district. They're shared by many districts in DuPage and all the other collar counties, and that was something that all member districts expressed concern about. We're still working through all of that, but it is looking much better than the original plan that was put forward by SASID that several of us raised concerns about. **Board Member:** Fantastic. **Board Member:** Thank you. All right, that wraps up our reports today. We do have a discussion item tonight. It's called "Setting the Stage for Success in Kindergarten." I'd like to welcome Mr. Sisle. --- **Mr. Sisle:** Good evening, everyone. Thank you. Tonight we're going to do a brief presentation and allow the board to have some discussion and ask some questions around a couple of ideas to further enhance our ability to set our kindergarten classrooms up for success at the start of each school year. These aren't new conversations internally. These are things we've been talking about for many years, as every grade level is unique. But the beginning of kindergarten presents some unique challenges and opportunities as we try to determine how we're going to begin the year for our youngest learners and how we're going to make sure that they are all set up for success in classrooms that are as well balanced and prepared for them as we can possibly create. Those really are the two things we're going to focus on tonight. We want to make sure we're thinking about how to build that full school community for our kindergarteners and also make sure that we are taking advantage of every possible opportunity to gather the information that will help us make the most informed decisions about class composition. These ideas that you're going to hear presented tonight come out of discussions that have happened for many years, but really rekindled this fall and have been the product of a few meetings with a number of kindergarten teachers and a number of administrators — really good dialogue, really open conversation — and an experience where the group kind of coalesced behind two significant ideas that we're going to talk about tonight. These aren't things that the board will formally vote upon, which is why it's a discussion item tonight, but we certainly wanted to give the board an opportunity to weigh in because it will have an impact on our incoming kindergarteners next year and potentially in the future. We think ultimately a very positive impact, but we certainly want to discuss that tonight. Liz is going to join me on the next slide, and we're also happy to welcome a few guests with us tonight. You'll hear from Ally Hedman, kindergarten teacher at Whittier; Elizabeth Zawatsky, kindergarten teacher at Hillcrest; Christy Hopkins, kindergarten teacher at Indian Trail; and Marissa Sanderson, kindergarten teacher at Fairmont. You'll recognize them from their kindergarten-based décor today — 100th Day teachers. You'll also hear from Dr. Lisa Niforatos, the principal at Fairmont. Again, this is a representation of all of the folks that have been part of this conversation. We'll be excited to welcome all of them up, and then at the end I'll wrap things up and hear your discussion and questions. --- **Liz:** Good evening, board. We wanted to start by sharing some of our current systems with you. We have a lot of really great traditional opportunities for our kindergarten families that give us a strong foundation. Our kindergarten roundup is held in March. That is for parents and guardians. They come to the school for an evening and get an overview of the daily structure, some building logistics, and information about kindergarten readiness skills that they can work on with their students over the remainder of the school year and over the summer as they get ready for kindergarten. We also send out surveys. Our Grove Preschool teachers will fill out surveys and have collaborative time with our kindergarten teachers for students who participate in that program, but we know that doesn't reach all of our students. So we do send surveys out to families — oftentimes we ask that the student's preschool teacher fills that out, but we also get information from families in those surveys as well. We offer Leap Into Kindergarten, which is an optional summer school session for incoming kindergarten students. Historically, we have about 75 students who participate. We strategically group those students so that they are with peers from their elementary school, so that they see some familiar faces when they start kindergarten — but of course that program doesn't reach all students. We work on kindergarten readiness and socialization. Our PTAs are fantastic. They run summer programs for our families — summer meetups at parks and on school grounds with popsicles and things like that — so that students and families can interact with one another. And then we hold an annual elementary school meet and greet, which historically has been a kindergarten-through-sixth-grade event, and this year would be the first time as a kindergarten-through-fifth-grade event. It's held a few days prior to school and is an opportunity for socialization and supply drop-off prior to the beginning of the school year. --- **Ally Hedman:** Hi, everybody. I'm Ally Hedman, kindergarten teacher at Whittier. I'm going to talk about the first enhancement idea that we came up with, which would be a separate meet and greet. Meet and greet right now is so fun because it is this massive reunification for everybody coming back to school from the summer. However, it does tend to get chaotic — revisiting old teachers, full hallways, and things like that. So we really want to try to separate the kindergarteners from that overwhelming experience and make it kindergarten-focused. We're thinking of potentially moving it a day earlier, somewhat in the evening or after work hours, to try to get as much engagement as possible. This is just an opportunity for the kindergarteners to see their new school. They can go in the classrooms, walk the halls, and have it not be congested and loud and overwhelming. It gives them time to be focused with the teachers — teachers won't be pulled in a hundred different directions — and we can really focus on getting to know those kids for that first meet-and-greet opportunity. It can also potentially provide an opportunity for the kids to try a story on the rug with the teachers while the parents separate and learn some of those first-day logistics, so they can get some of that covered before the big first day of kindergarten. Again, it's just another opportunity for the kids to get a little bit more comfortable with their teachers before that first day of school. I'm going to pass it off to Elizabeth. --- **Elizabeth Zawatsky:** I'm Elizabeth Zawatsky, kindergarten teacher at Hillcrest, and I'm also a parent of an incoming kindergartener in a District 58 school. Along with providing kindergarteners with their own meet-and-greet experience, we'd also like to adjust what the first few days of school look like in order to build more balanced classes. What makes kindergarten unique is that we are building our classes with students from a very wide range of pre-kindergarten experiences. The student information we gain right now comes mainly from surveys. It's relevant to those pre-kindergarten settings and not necessarily to our current classroom expectations. We feel that getting real-time information about students would be most beneficial, and that oftentimes within those first few days of school, we as teachers can already see adjustments that would be helpful in student groupings. We recognize that restructuring the beginning of the year would be an adjustment for parents and for students, but we're excited at the thought of creating a strong sense of community and welcoming kids into their home school. What this could look like — we have used the terms "Camp Kindergarten" or "Team Kindergarten" in our discussions to reflect that students would be assigned a team at the beginning of the year rather than a classroom teacher for the first two days. Like camp, student groupings would change throughout the day depending on the activity. Students could wear a lanyard with their team color to indicate their core group, but with additional markings to show other groups they'd be a part of throughout the day. The benefits of this would be that students get to meet and interact with all of their kindergarten peers, and adults would be able to observe and interact with all students as well to gain as much information as possible about how to create those balanced classes. --- **Christy Hopkins:** Hi, I'm Christy Hopkins, kindergarten teacher at Indian Trail. During the first couple of days of kindergarten, our primary focus is really teaching our new kindergarteners how to be a student within the school community. We want to focus on routines and relationships, building learner behaviors that help our students feel safe and confident and ready to learn, rather than conducting more academic or skill-based assessments. This structure is designed to create a predictable and welcoming start to the school year for our kindergarteners, and by focusing on those relationships and routines, we can really help students build confidence and feel secure in this new environment. After those first two days of Camp Kindergarten, families would receive communication sharing their child's classroom teacher assignment for the remainder of the year. This allows us time to use the information and experiences from those two days to support balancing classroom communities. Beginning on that third day, students would join their assigned classroom teacher and begin building their classroom community. This is where individual classroom routines, relationships, and learning expectations would all be established and would hopefully support a strong and successful school year. Both Marissa Sanderson and I are going to highlight some things from our prior Camp Kindergarten experience, which was back in 2019. What I would tell you is that successfully initiating that process really did involve a lot of strong collaboration at the building level. Just like with anything new, communication was really key, and it took on a couple of different forms to make sure that parents and all of our families were getting the information they needed. This included an initial introduction letter about what Camp Kindergarten would look like, what they could expect, what their child could expect, and really the "why" behind the process — making sure that was very clearly communicated with some time between the different communications. The other important thing that came out of that experience was ensuring that our families had points of contact during those first two days. We get a lot of contact from incoming kindergarten families, and while they didn't have that one point of contact with their classroom teacher, they did know who to contact, and communications back and forth were very fluid and included both teachers. Our school team built a system where we were truly all hands on deck for that unique experience those first two days — kindergarten teachers, specialists, and the student support team — and that added to the success of the program. At Fairmont, and similarly at Whittier, we fielded really only about one or two additional phone calls from parents with logistical questions. They weren't concerns by any means, just a couple of questions about the process, which we were obviously happy to address. It wasn't a flood of calls, and that really speaks to the importance of proactive communication being in place prior to starting anything new. From a global or building level, Camp Kindergarten was centered around kids rather than the class for those first two days, and it really provided students with an opportunity to learn about the school as a collective unit. It was a fun and supportive way to start the school year. --- **Marissa Sanderson:** Hi there. There are some benefits I'd like to highlight from my experience with Camp Kindergarten in 2019. First was a comprehensive knowledge of all of the students who came in. It really allowed both kindergarten teachers to develop a shared understanding of all the children in the grade level, not just the students assigned to your classroom. This included really important information such as medical needs and allergies, learning styles, social-emotional needs, and family dynamics. At the same time, the opposite was also true — students got to become familiar with both teachers and both classroom environments, giving them a great knowledge of both classes. After placements were finalized, students already felt a sense of familiarity and safety across the kindergarten wing, which helped reduce some of the anxiety of coming into kindergarten at the beginning of the school year. Second, there was a stronger kindergarten community feel. It truly fostered a grade-level approach rather than a "my class versus your class" model. We were able to get more eyes on students and see if there were additional needs quickly. We also had extra staff in the classrooms — reading specialists, OT, and speech pathologists were able to push in early, observe students in their setting, and begin supporting right away. This collaborative approach emphasized that kindergarten is a shared responsibility and helped build a cohesive, supportive learning community for students from that very first day. Third was increased flexibility and stronger instructional collaboration. Because both teachers were able to work with all of the students, instructional grouping felt more natural and fluid. While collaborative grouping can happen regardless, Camp Kindergarten made it more effective because students had already been formally introduced to both teachers, both classrooms, and the shared routines. It created a stronger sense of teamwork and made instructional decision-making more informed and intentional. I also want to provide some context about kindergarten placement and articulation. In most grade levels, teachers spend a great deal of time at the end of the school year articulating with the following grade level's teachers — sharing detailed information about students' growth, their needs, and strategies that may have been helpful. This process allows the next teacher to get a valuable head start and insight into students' needs and successes. In kindergarten, we simply do not have that opportunity. While a small number of kids may come from Grove Preschool, the majority of students coming into our classrooms are brand new to us. We've tried to bridge that gap through parent surveys and outreach to preschools, but participation varies. As a result, kindergarten teachers often begin the year with very limited or no information on any of the children walking into the classroom. Camp Kindergarten helped to create a form of articulation where one simply does not naturally exist. Even in a short time frame, it allowed teachers to collaborate, observe students, and begin discussing support strategies and skill development before students were permanently placed into a classroom. This early insight helped us make more informed decisions and allowed students to begin their kindergarten experience on a stronger footing. I also want to acknowledge that Camp Kindergarten did require additional planning on the front end. My teaching partner and I at the time had met over the summer to coordinate logistics and prepare intentionally. However, we felt that that upfront investment resulted in a smoother, more natural flow once the school year began, and it ultimately increased our ability to be more proactive and less reactive as the year continued. It really has been a topic of heavy discussion within our grade level, and my colleagues have continued to advocate for some form of Camp Kindergarten and have continually brought the idea up during grade level meetings. There seems to be a strong willingness to invest that time early if it means providing a more seamless, supportive transition for our youngest learners. --- **Mr. Sisle:** So from here, you've heard the shell of some of the logistics. There's obviously a lot more to build out, but we wanted to make sure that we are all in alignment conceptually with moving forward so that we can begin to build out further details. You heard about the importance of communication that would begin at our kindergarten roundups, which will begin to occur next month, and that really is our target to launch these ideas. We've been in communication with the entire kindergarten team, but we really want to take some collaborative opportunities to make sure that everyone is a part of this, which helps ensure consistency of experiences across the district. Some of that pre-planning work that Marissa was just talking about can be done now; some of it obviously we can't do until we have the list of kids and all of that information. Our goal and our recommendation would be to implement both of these enhancements beginning this fall, with the recognition that — just as we do with all new things — there will need to be time to reflect upon the experience, to gain feedback from families that have gone through it, and to really see whether this is yielding the benefits we hope it will. One thing that is important to re-emphasize is that when we did do this in two buildings, there really wasn't the hesitation in the parent community that we might have been concerned about. We had a couple of questions, but there was not a strong parental or familial concern that came out, and it ended up being a very positive experience that people still remember and occasionally talk about. So that would be our plan going forward. At this point I want to open it up to board questions or any discussion you'd like to have around these ideas. --- **Board Member:** Thank you. I'll open the floor. Does anybody want to start with a question? **Board Member:** The only question I had — I think it makes sense, and it's exciting, not only for the teachers. I've got a little one who'll be coming into kindergarten shortly, so I think it makes a lot of sense and it would be exciting to know that this will help inform the decisions about their classroom placement. My only question was: was two days determined to be enough? It sounds like you have experience with the two days and have deemed it sufficient, but I just wanted to gut-check whether a longer period was considered. **Mr. Sisle:** That's a great question, and we actually did have a slightly longer experience at Whittier during one of those two years where they went all the way to five days. The feedback we got was that that might have been a little long — we were ready to move forward after two or three. Looking at next year's calendar, with the way Thursday, Friday, and then Monday align as a natural break after the weekend, that's why we're looking at a two-day model for next year. The consensus from the limited number of people who had experienced it was that two or three days felt right-sized. **Board Member:** Thank you. **Board Member:** I had a similar concern, especially around families finding out their classroom assignment on a Friday. It seems like a lot to put on our kindergarten teachers — to get through those two days and then put the placement information in writing, and have families receive it on a Friday when they don't really have a point of contact for the whole weekend. I would just suggest giving a little more thought to whether that Monday could help with the transition. **Mr. Sisle:** We've had some of those conversations, and I appreciate that perspective. That's one of the things we'll be finalizing in our next steps. **Board Member:** Would all of our schools be having this? Are there schools that would only have one section of kindergarten where they would still have Camp Kindergarten, but the students would already know who their teacher was? **Mr. Sisle:** That's a great question. This year we don't have any schools with a single section of kindergarten, but we don't know that will always be the case, so you're right — there could be some uniqueness there. The one other spot that will be unique is the LCRA dual language program, where there is only one dual language kindergarten teacher. We have talked about how to incorporate some of those Camp Kindergarten experiences for all of the students, even though some will know where they're ultimately going to land prior to that. If we were in a one-section situation, we would look at how to incorporate similar experiences, knowing that in the end there is only one kindergarten classroom. **Board Member:** That actually makes me think about the dual language program in terms of special program kindergarteners — BEST RISE and DLP. I'm assuming those students would also be invited to attend with the regular education kindergarten teachers, but would those special program teachers also be there? How would that look for kids who might not be full time in the regular education kindergarten? **Mr. Sisle:** That's a great question, and yes — we want to work to balance those experiences, but we also want to be cognizant of the level of inclusion that's planned for those kindergarten students and make sure that we are setting them up for success in the best way we can. Certainly we would want to join those experiences where possible, but we also need to consider the establishment of routines that some of those students will particularly benefit from based on— **[Unidentified Board Member]:** At the end there is one kindergarten classroom. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** You just made me think of, when you brought up the dual language in terms of special program kindergarteners — Best Rise, DLP — I'm assuming those students would also be invited to attend with the regular education kindergarten teachers, but would those special programs teachers also be there? Like, how would that look for those kids who might not be full time in the regular ed kindergarten? **[Dr. Harris]:** That's a great question, and obviously yes, we want to work to balance some of those experiences, but we also want to be cognizant of the level of inclusion that's planned for those kindergarten students in those programs and make sure that we are setting them up for success in the best way that we can. I think yes, certainly we would want to join those experiences where possible, but also the establishment of some of the routines that some of those students will benefit from, based on their individual plans, may lead us to some different ways of thinking about that as we get to the final preparations. Again, that'll be sort of where, as we're getting into the true lists of students, we'll be making some of those determinations. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** The other programs that were mentioned — the traditional programs such as the kindergarten roundup and the Leap into Kindergarten — would those still be in place and not affected at all by this change? **[Dr. Harris]:** Absolutely. The roundup is primarily a family information night that would continue and be where we'd communicate some of these things. The Leap into Kindergarten program is planned as part of our summer experience. What's important to recognize in all of those things is that it is very challenging, if not impossible, to reach all students across those events — you may actually touch all the students, but what we're trying to accomplish is those moments where, at the beginning of the year, meet and greet is definitely most if not all, but then those first two days are truly all. And I think that's the difference, and that was really a big part of our conversation with the working group — that whatever we do, we really want to make sure that it is touching all of the students who are coming to us at the beginning of the year. **[Unidentified Staff Member]:** One of the big events that we know is attended very well is kindergarten roundup. And that's why we wanted to have this conversation tonight before we move forward, because as Lisa shared, communication is just so important with this one, especially if families have a child entering kindergarten but they might have an older sibling. If you don't get that class notification in kindergarten, we want to make sure that families know about any potential changes, especially at the roundup. And of course we'll communicate it a hundred different ways, but we wanted to make sure that we have that conversation at the roundup so parents know that over the summer they wouldn't be getting a kindergarten class list, even though their other children may. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Do those roundups typically happen during the school day or after school? **[Unidentified Staff Member]:** They're all in the evening at school. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** All in the evening. And do we provide a virtual option for families or a recording? **[Unidentified Staff Member]:** We don't — the information that is presented is available, but we don't do it virtually live or anything like that, and I don't believe we have a recording at this point. During COVID we did that, but we have not continued that. Now it is more of a live event, but all of the information is sort of the launch of a lot of content, and then it's all very easily discoverable and pushed out in several different ways as we go through. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Perhaps just an option, if we are going to go with Camp Kindergarten, of having some sort of video versus a handout of what it should look like. I think the team did a great job of making it very student-centered and that it really is going to be meeting the needs of students and where they're at by matching them with a classroom that's going to help them grow. But I think it's translating that so families can understand how student-centered it really is. And it seems like there's a good amount of collaboration happening in these kindergarten classrooms anyway, because then it becomes less of a "who did they get" — they're getting the same experience across all 58 classrooms, and they see that partnership from the beginning as such a powerful instructional tool. **[Unidentified Staff Member]:** Absolutely. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Other questions or comments? **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Quick question, because we had done this in some spots previously. Just knowing some of the history here in Downers Grove — how have families and students handled the fact that now they've got a taste of the school and they might start to get an opinion on "I want to be in this class" or "I made a friend and I want to be with that friend"? How is that handled when it happens after they've started the experience, where people might start to form stronger opinions, as opposed to getting that notification, talking with your student in advance, and coming into the room with momentum? There's sort of a routine that families have of "we're going to check and this is who you have and we're going to introduce that person" and there's a sense of "I've got my momentum, I'm going to start to build a relationship." How did that go in the two years at one location and the one year at the other location? **[Dr. Harris]:** We did not experience any of that, because again, those are things we'd all kind of anticipated — what happens when you get that comment or question or concern on day three or four? And we truly didn't have that experience. I can't tell you it will never happen, but it was not part of that experience. As we reflected on why that might be, there was definitely a lot of conversation about the deliberate efforts to make sure that everything was balanced during Camp Kindergarten — so no one group spent more time with Teacher A than Teacher B, and the groupings were moving around during the day so the kids were interacting with multiple other students instead of being in a consistent core group. I think it was that deliberate exposure to everything in a really balanced format that helped make sure those relationships were growing across the board, and we kind of minimized the risk of a child feeling "I am spending more time with Teacher A and therefore I'm going to feel a certain way if I end up in Teacher B's classroom." A lot of deliberate planning went into making sure that was balanced. But honestly, we did not experience that concern coming out of the initial experiences. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Perfect. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Looks like you have a question. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** No. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Okay. All right. Well, thank you. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Appreciate it. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Thank you to our kindergarten team. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Yeah, thank you all for being here tonight. --- **[Board President Hughes]:** All right. Public comment time. This is an opportunity for members of the audience to share public comment with the board, but is not intended to be a time for members of the public to enter into a dialogue with the board. Issues raised during public comment may be addressed by administrative staff as appropriate or added to future agenda items. The board has allowed 30 minutes for public comment this evening. We ask you to keep it to a three-minute limit to give everyone an opportunity to speak. Do we have anything in the basket? We do not have anything in the basket. Is there anyone here wishing to make public comment? If so, please step up to the mic and state your name and attendance area or your place of employment. All right, then we'll move on. Next up is going to be the approval of minutes. Are there suggested revisions to the minutes as presented in the packet of materials? All right. If not, is there a motion to approve the minutes from the January 12th, 2026 regular meeting as presented? **[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second. **[Board President Hughes]:** All those in favor? **[Board Members]:** Aye. **[Board President Hughes]:** Any opposed? The motion carried to approve the minutes of the January 12th, 2026 regular meeting as presented. Is there a motion to approve the minutes of the January 26th, 2026 financial workshop as presented? **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Motion. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second. **[Board President Hughes]:** All those in favor? **[Board Members]:** Aye. **[Board President Hughes]:** Any opposed? The motion carried to approve the minutes of the January 26th, 2026 financial workshop as presented. We have a consent agenda tonight. Are there any items a board member would like to have considered separately? All right. If not, is there a motion to approve the consent agenda consisting of the personnel report and the financial statements consisting of the list of bills and summary? **[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second. **[Board President Hughes]:** All right. Thank you. Melissa, please call roll. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas. **[Thomas]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard. **[Bernard]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi. **[Doshi]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus. **[Hanus]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk. **[Olczyk]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes. **[Hughes]:** Aye. **[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried. The consent agenda has been approved as presented in the packet of materials. As part of this consent agenda, the board has hired a new principal for Whittier School. I'd like to hand it over to you, Dr. Russell, to introduce him. --- **[Dr. Russell]:** Thank you very much. This is always one of the most exciting things I get to do as superintendent. I want to thank so many of the Whittier staff members who are here tonight to welcome our new principal. As you know, Whittier principal Michael Krugman will retire at the end of this school year after 15 years of dedicated service to our school district and Whittier in particular. We will miss his leadership and will also just miss his presence and everything he does for Whittier. We certainly wish Michael and his family the very best in a well-deserved retirement. Because this was a planned retirement, we began the principal selection process early, which ensured a strong pool of candidates and will allow for a smooth transition. This process included multiple interviews with administrators and staff, as well as input from Whittier staff, support personnel, families, and even a student council focus group — that was a lot of fun during the process. From this collective feedback, Mr. Brian Bolton emerged as the strongest candidate, and we were pleased to recommend him for appointment as principal of Whittier School in the personnel agenda. Brian brings more than 13 years of experience in education. He currently serves as the principal of Fullerton Elementary School in Addison School District 4. He has also served as an assistant principal in both Itasca and Lyons school districts and as a middle school social studies teacher. He began his career right here in District 58 as a student teacher at Herrick Middle School. Mr. Bolton holds a master's degree in educational leadership from NIU and a bachelor's degree in secondary education from Lewis University. Brian also has strong ties to our community. He attended Indian Trail Elementary and O'Neill Middle School, graduated from Downers Grove South High School, and currently lives in Downers Grove with his wife and children, who joined us this evening — nice to see you kids. He is eager to give back to the community that shaped him and to get to know our students, families, and staff in the greater Whittier School community. Please join me in welcoming Mr. Brian Bolton to Whittier School and as our new principal. --- **[Mr. Bolton]:** Well, thank you, Board of Education and District 58 community. This is a bit of a surreal moment for me to be back here after all these years, in a district that gave me so much. My daughters are going to be going through Kingsley, so it's really exciting to be able to contribute to the Downers Grove community in this way. I'm really looking forward to working with Mr. Krugman, the Whittier community, and the Whittier teachers and staff who are here today, and to really hit the ground running to ensure a smooth transition, build on some traditions, and transition into the future. Again, my sincerest gratitude — thank you for giving me this opportunity, and I won't let you down. Thank you. **[Board President Hughes]:** Thank you. Congratulations. --- All right, we have a couple of items up for action tonight. First up is the 2026–2027 school fees. Is there a motion to approve the school fees for the 2026–27 school year as presented? **[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second. **[Board President Hughes]:** Any discussion? All right. Melissa, please call roll. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk. **[Olczyk]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas. **[Thomas]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard. **[Bernard]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi. **[Doshi]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus. **[Hanus]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes. **[Hughes]:** Aye. **[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried to approve the school fees for the 2026–27 school year as presented. Next up, we have a resolution for the dismissal of a custodial maintenance employee for reasons other than reduction in force. Is there a motion to adopt the resolution for the dismissal of a custodial maintenance employee for reasons other than reduction in force? **[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second. **[Board President Hughes]:** Melissa, please call roll. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk. **[Olczyk]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas. **[Thomas]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard. **[Bernard]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi. **[Doshi]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus. **[Hanus]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes. **[Hughes]:** Aye. **[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried to adopt the resolution for the dismissal of a custodial maintenance employee for reasons other than reduction in force. I have a construction consent agenda tonight. Are there any items a board member would like to have considered separately? All right. If not, is there a motion to approve the construction consent agenda consisting of the elementary school kitchen equipment purchase? **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Motion. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second. **[Board President Hughes]:** Thank you. Melissa, please call roll. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard. **[Bernard]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi. **[Doshi]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus. **[Hanus]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk. **[Olczyk]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas. **[Thomas]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes. **[Hughes]:** Aye. **[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried. The construction consent agenda has been approved as presented in the packet of materials. I have a couple of announcements. Friday, February 20th at 7:00 a.m. will be our legislative breakfast, and then Monday, February 23rd at 7:00 p.m. will be the curriculum workshop, right back here at the Downers Grove Civic Center. The board will now meet in closed session. Is there a motion to move to closed session to discuss the appointment, employment, compensation, discipline, performance, or dismissal of a specific employee of the district — that's 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(1) — and the collective negotiating matters between the public body and its employees or their representatives, or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more classes of employees — that's 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(2) — and for the discussion of minutes of meetings lawfully closed under the Open Meetings Act, whether for the purpose of approval of those minutes by the body or the semiannual review of the minutes as mandated by Section 2.06 — that's 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(21)? **[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved. **[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second. **[Board President Hughes]:** Any discussion on that? All right. Melissa, please call roll. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi. **[Doshi]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus. **[Hanus]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk. **[Olczyk]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas. **[Thomas]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard. **[Bernard]:** Aye. **[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes. **[Hughes]:** Aye. **[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried. The board will now move into closed session after a short recess. It's 8:24 — let's try to be in there in four minutes, at 8:28.

Cleaned version uses AI to add punctuation, paragraphs, and speaker labels. Switch to "Original" for the unmodified auto-caption.